Fund Discovery — Zerodha Fund House
01
Fund Discovery · Product Design

Finding the fund
you didn't know
you were looking for

A new AMC with four funds, zero brand recognition, and two completely different users arriving at the same page. Three weeks to design a discovery experience that worked for both.

Company Zerodha Fund House
Role Product Designer
Timeline 3 weeks design · Mid-July 2024 launch
Review Period July to September 2024
What was already built
Individual scheme pages covering holdings, past performance, benchmarks, tax implications, risk-o-meter, and fund manager profiles. The depth existed.
The missing layer
How does a user find the right fund in the first place? The website did not have a proper entry point for users to ask the right question.
The constraint
4 funds today. Largecap ETF, Midcap ETF, Target Date Funds on the roadmap. The system had to work at 4 and not break at 40.
My scope
Operated as a UX and UI designer, researcher a product strategy partner to the PM and a collaborator to business.
The Problem

Users could not find the right fund because the site was organised for the wrong question

The site was organised around how funds are classified, not around why someone would invest in one. SEBI's standard categories assume financial literacy the average retail investor does not have.

With 4 funds at launch, category-based browsing would surface 1 to 2 results per section. A dead end that undermines trust before it is even built. The website had the right answers. It was asking users the wrong questions.

"Limited knowledge about fund types and time-consuming research"

Most cited barrier · User interviews across all demographics
Equity Funds
Showing 1 of 1 fund
Debt Funds
No funds in this category yet
Category-first browsing at 4 funds: dead ends erode trust

User Research

Two users.
One surface.

Qualitative interviews with 6 to 7 users (informed by a broader survey of ~150 respondents across Tier 1, 2, and 3 cities) revealed a clean split in how people approached fund selection.

Use case 01
The Explorer
Arrives without a specific fund in mind
Needs relatable language. "Tax Saving," not "ELSS"
Wants to understand what a fund is 'for', before what it 'is'
Social proof and low minimum investment as confidence triggers
Use case 02
The Intent-Driven User
Already knows what they want. ELSS, index fund, liquid ETF
Needs speed: search, filters, comparison parameters
Industry-standard terminology matters for consistency
Every extra step is friction they did not ask for

Most AMCs solve for one type and hope the other figures it out. The opportunity was designing for both without the experience feeling cluttered to either.


Competitive Analysis

Why the standard
playbook didn't work

Analysis across Groww, Coin, Angle One, smallcase, and international AMCs surfaced a consistent gap. Every platform solved for one user type. None balanced both well.

Groww
Goal-based collections work for explorers but bury technical details experienced investors need.
Alienates experts
Angle One
Complex secondary categorizations immediately deter anyone who is not already financially confident.
Alienates new users
smallcase
Custom filter UI for user understanding, but sacrifices consistency with industry conventions.
Inconsistent language
The shared blind spot
A dedicated category page, the industry default, actively deters experienced investors who already know what they want.
Both users compromised

The architecture could not route either user type through the other's experience. Both paths had to exist on the same surface.


The Decision

Solve for both.
But lead with the harder problem

Two structural approaches were on the table. The call required weighing clean IA against conversion risk.

Option A
Separate sections for each user type
Pro Cleaner communication per segment
Pro Easier behavioural tracking
Pro Simpler information hierarchy
Con Explorers may never reach the browsing section if IA funnels them away
Chosen
Option B
Balance both within one experience
Pro Explorers get educational context upfront
Pro Intent-driven users skip it entirely
Pro Both conversion paths are active simultaneously
Con Risk of decision fatigue without strong visual hierarchy

The page leads with Investment Goals: curated, relatable, low-friction. Below it, the full fund listing with search, filters, and sorting. Two entry points. One page. Each user self-selects their path.

Task flow — two entry paths, one destination
Homepage
Explore Collections
Goal selected
Pre-filtered list
Fund Detail Page
Homepage
See All Funds
Search or Filter
Fund Detail Page
Fund Discovery page — desktop and mobile
The Work

What I designed

01 — For the Explorer

Investment Goals

Collections framed around user intent: "Build Core Portfolio," "Tax Saving," "Long Term Investing," "Liquidity." Each maps to 1 to 2 funds today. The structure absorbs new products without restructuring the page.

Every label was chosen to meet the user where they are. "Tax Saving" over "ELSS." "Build Core Portfolio" over "Large and Midcap Index Fund." The naming was the design.

How the collection names were chosen
Product-type Dropped
Index Fund ETF Target Date
Requires prior knowledge. Does not help new investors orient themselves.
Asset class Dropped
Equity Debt Commodity
Familiar to existing investors, but a fund can span multiple classes. Categories become arbitrary.
Trending Options Dropped
Popular Zerodha Funds India's Leaders Index Investing Invest and Forget
Strong for discovery, but duplicates what filters and search already surface. Risks becoming stale and requires ongoing curation.
Goal-based Selected
Tax Saver Core Portfolio Wealth Builder Long Term
Relatable across all user types. Scales as catalog grows. Matches how people think about money, not how regulators classify it.
20+ tag groupings explored. "Investment Solutions" and "Investment Goals" selected as the two collection frameworks.
Investment Goals section — desktop and mobile
02 — For the Intent-Driven User

Search and Filters that don't intimidate

Smart search supporting fund names, tickers, and categories, with recent searches and most-searched options as quick-access tags. Scoped to the listing page at launch; global search noted as a future expansion.

One detail that mattered: fund count shown per filter option. Competitor research showed hidden result counts caused users to click into categories and immediately leave when they found 1 result. "Index Fund (2)" sets expectations upfront.

What made the cut and what didn't
Included
Asset Class
Widely understood by existing investors. Gold, Equity, Debt — vocabulary that will only become more relevant as awareness grows.
Investment Goals
Builds relatability for new investors. "Ideal For" framing bridges the vocabulary gap without requiring financial literacy.
NFO Toggle
Simple and high-signal. Lets users validate marketing intent: someone who saw an NFO announcement can find it instantly.
Min. Investment
Lets newer investors quickly filter to what's within reach. Especially relevant for SIPs starting at Rs. 100.
Excluded
Risk Level
The internal structure (Very High / Moderately High / Moderate) is non-intuitive and invites misinterpretation. Shown on fund cards as a tag instead.
Marketing Category
Adds decision fatigue without meaningfully narrowing the list at a 4-fund catalog size.
Fund Age / Benchmark
Not yet a trust signal for a new AMC. Benchmark is implied in fund names. Neither accelerates a decision by a noticeable margin.
Fund listing with active filters — desktop and mobile
03 — A decision surface in itself

The Fund Card

Each scheme page was already fully built. The card had to decide: how much of that belongs here? The answer required thinking about who is looking at a fund card and what they need to do next.

Zerodha Nifty LargeMidcap 250 Index Fund icon
Zerodha Nifty LargeMidcap 250 Index Fund
ZN250
Low Investment Amount No Lock In Top 250 Companies
Returns 12.26%
AUM ₹532.1Cr
Min. Amount ₹100
Know More — routes to full scheme page
Explorers building confidence, wanting to understand before committing
Institutional investors conducting due diligence
Fund managers benchmarking
First-time investors reading everything before acting
Invest Now — skips scheme page entirely
Repeat investors (30 to 40% of new purchases) who already know the fund
Referral-driven investors who arrive pre-convinced
Advisor-handholded investors whose research was done elsewhere
One card, two distinct journeys, zero dead ends. Without forcing a detour on users who don't need one.

What changed

0 %
of all site traffic navigates to individual fund pages from the explore listing
0 %
of all site traffic converts directly from the Investment Goals section, the explorer path working exactly as designed
31 to 0 %
retention rate, a +8 point lift in returning visitors after the goals section launched
~ 0 %
AUM growth rate increase from funds surfaced through the discovery and goals flow
Data: July 10 to September 30, 2024 · Fund Discovery and Investment Goals launched simultaneously, mid-July 2024
Reflection

Three things I'd
do differently

01
Fight harder for social proof
"X investors bought this fund in the past 30 days" was identified in research as a potential conversion lever. It did not ship. Compliance concerns were real, but I did not come back with SEBI-compliant precedents from other AMCs. The conversion data suggests it was worth the second push.
02
Instrument the dual-path decision
I made a directional call on Option B without setting up instrumentation to validate it against Option A. The 30% conversion from the goals section suggests it was right, but I was measuring outcome, not causality. Instrument first, next time.
03
Ship category education on demand
Research showed a significant knowledge gap. Most users were familiar with equity, little else. I designed contextual education to live inside the filter drawer, surfaced on demand. It was deprioritized due to dev bandwidth. Given the data on user knowledge gaps, it would have moved the needle.